brazerzkidaifund.blogg.se - How to see firefox version in rhel 7.2

#How to see firefox version in rhel 7.2 update
#How to see firefox version in rhel 7.2 plus

#How to see firefox version in rhel 7.2 plus

Plus there's additional administrative effort, if you need to change support channels for affected systems.Still, the EUS is more limited compared to the standard support you receive for "latest" with the standard subscriptions.That's not included in standard RedHat subscriptions, and needs to be subscribed / purchased on-top.

#How to see firefox version in rhel 7.2 update

As an alternative, it's possible to get Extended Update Support (EUS) on (selected) minor releases from RedHat.

Business opportunity for this case would be based on "risk evaluation" of running servers with publicly known security issues.

(SUSE does a different policy here, where Service Pack X is supported for a 6 months period after the release of X+1, giving you ~6 months for integration, regression testing, application compatibility assurance, and upgrade.).

(There may be cases, where you can "back-port" the fixes yourself but that's outside of RedHat support.).

That would mean >3 months before fixing critical security flaws. > If it's not in 7.15, I assume we'll have to wait for 7.16 / around November 2017?

So, if a critical security issue with RedHat 7 is found today, and RedHat delivers the fix tomorrow, we would have to wait with roll-out of those fixes until XenDesktopVDA supports RHEL 7.4.

I.e.: 7.3 is frozen and won't receive any fixes, once 7.4 is released.

If you need to get technical support from RedHat, they will help (within agreements), but any fixes will only be delivered on "latest".

) are found, fixed, and released, you must be on "latest" to ensure timely delivery of fixes for the security issues. Given the frequency, with which severe/critical security issues for core system components (CVEs.There is only "the latest RHEL 7" (rolling across the minors), which offers up-to-date security updates and bug fixes.

Reason: RHEL releases are "continuous/rolling" - withing any major (say: 7), the minor releases (like 7.4) are only "snapshots", when larger parts of the system get refreshed/rebased / new features get included.

From pure operational point of view, support for "latest minor" of RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is a must.

That's from security/operations perspective a very bad situation to be in." "If we cannot update our RHEL7 systems (running XenDesktopVDA 7.14 on RHEL 7.3) to 7.4 (due to XDL not working there), we're cut off from RedHat security updates until we can. (A colleague asked me, to make this more brief hence a short summary to start with:) Hi Yuan, I can offer the following consideration: